1020 2015 二

晚上，決定將此文提到的日本畫家等的英文找出來，
A View of Japan Through Japanese Art, Song of the Brush: Japanese Painting from Sanso Collection (Seattle: Seattle Art Museum)這實在是篇好文章。
此篇收入Toward the Next Economics and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1981)
有漢譯：【邁向經濟的新紀元--日本成功的代價】，林肇熙譯，台北：志文 (據日譯本)，1986
1986年，志文出版林肇熙譯的Peter Drucker的書。現在，網路上找不到他的資料。
我對照英文，約95 %以上的正確率，很難得。
從64號帶回6本英中文的日本匯畫史。
我出去繳款：2處電費1220元。
過麥當勞，近9點，懷恩堂有戶外、室內節目。
聯經的書很多，在近百本平擺的新書中有梁永安先生翻譯Will Durant 的【落葉】(商周)，這本書的起頭，我們SU小組討論過，我似乎還搞錯美國某小報。
出去，經巷口，一老婦身手矯健整理廢棄紙袋，摩托車車尾疊5大袋，拖一小袋、車前也掛2袋。她前方2公尺處是賣自助Yogurt，內有母女，狀幸福。
台大誠品店一樓逛逛，很不一樣的書，我在幾家美英大學出版社 (各家擺幾本，有Johns Hopskins的，竟然是 Of Grammatology By Jacques Derrida)前看看，每本書都超過千元。
回程買4塊炸雞.....



可能6點半即起。弄吃麵線10分鐘。
上網最大的問題是無意間"工會是QM阻力"一文竟然不見了，很慘：要更新Bill的來信時。
司馬中原的台大學思歷程，沒重點，聽30分就關掉。
讀完：The World According to Peter Drucker, 1997

大師的軌跡 : 探索杜拉克的世界 / 傑克. 畢提(Jack Beatty)著 ; 李田樹譯

臺北市 : 天下遠見出版 ; [臺北縣三重市] :  1998

思考自己的立足點和寫書
策略

請教William Scherkenbach先生美國工會對品質運動的阻力 (Peter Drucker說法)

Dear Bill,

I am preparing to write a book on Deming and Drucker, extending my October 14 talks on their careers in NYU.

Drucker Archive is a very interesting data base.

I like your input on Drucker opinion that even his close friend Dr. Deming did not know the Union is the main barrier to promote QM and Industrial Community.

http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/dac/id/3662/rec/10

Correspondence from Peter Drucker to James Hoopes, Boston College, 2000-11-28

• Letters; Drucker, Peter F. (Peter Ferdinand), 1909-2005; Hoopes, James, 1944-; Authorship; Corporations; Labor unions; Deming, W. Edwards (William Edwards), 1900-1993; Juran, J. M. (Joseph M.), 1904-; Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David),...
• Peter Drucker writes James Hoopes, professor at Babson College, saying that he has attached a list of his publications. He says that the tardy acceptance of ideas such as quality management or empowerment in the United States was primarily because...

Best Regards,

Hanching Chung (or HC/ hc)

-------
2015.10.20

William Scherkenbach	2:51 AM (4 hours ago)
to me

I have learned that different people have different perspectives, even on the same observation.  Dr. Deming observed that “If the two of us always agreed, then one of us is redundant.”  My perspective on the union influence pertains only to what I observed in the auto industry and the UAW in particular.  Ford was lucky to have Don Ephlin as head of the UAW Ford Department.  The timing was right because the American public was giving the Unions and the American Auto companies a hard time.  Japanese quality was perceived to be “better” than American quality.  Ephlin spoke to Ford management and said (approximately) I cannot go to my people and sell productivity because that means layoffs.  I can go and tell them to improve quality, and everyone knows that if you improve quality, you improve productivity, but you cannot be laying my people off.

If it wasn’t for Ephlin, the efforts at Ford and then GM would not have gotten off the ground.  

I think there was a competition between Unions.  They were not of one voice.  Drucker saw a side that Deming did not.  And Deming saw a side that Drucker did not.  It is very dangerous to generalize.

Bill