http://hctranslations.blogspot.tw/2015/03/blog-post_9.html
物換星移幾度秋：寄小讀者
HC我最近到台北市立教育大學教授{戴明領導手冊}(The Leader Handbook)，準備功課時重讀它和相關書籍，百感交集。
1993年五月，英國戴明協會(BDA)舉辦第六屆年會，Peter Scholtes 負責最後一小時的總結，後來將演講稿等整理出版小冊子（編號W4；屬BDA的世界系列），書名為Learning and Leadership。這本，後來編成 The Leader Handbook 的一部分，詳{戴明領導手冊} 。不過，現在讀 Learning and Leadership可以有點”身歷其境”的感受。這是整理成書之後無法體會的。書的（口語）序文（開場白）取名Preamble，都是較不常見的用法。 一開始說：The assignment was interesting: it was one hour with no title. Sort of an 007 topic. I have licence to kill, I guess.
2006-10-12
物換星移幾度秋：寄小讀者
HC我最近到台北市立教育大學教授{戴明領導手冊}(The Leader Handbook)，準備功課時重讀它和相關書籍，百感交集。
1993年五月，英國戴明協會(BDA)舉辦第六屆年會，Peter Scholtes 負責最後一小時的總結，後來將演講稿等整理出版小冊子（編號W4；屬BDA的世界系列），書名為Learning and Leadership。這本，後來編成 The Leader Handbook 的一部分，詳{戴明領導手冊} 。不過，現在讀 Learning and Leadership可以有點”身歷其境”的感受。這是整理成書之後無法體會的。書的（口語）序文（開場白）取名Preamble，都是較不常見的用法。 一開始說：The assignment was interesting: it was one hour with no title. Sort of an 007 topic. I have licence to kill, I guess.
2006-10-12
小讀者：preamble 通常是放在”正式文件”前以述解正文之旨, 如美國獨立宣言, 憲法等在正文前都有這麼一個preamble. 他 (sic) 許{戴明領導手冊} 也是這個用意吧?
王勃那”區區”滕王閣八句*, 卻寫了老長一篇序, 應該也算是”preamble”吧 wink 表情符號
王勃那”區區”滕王閣八句*, 卻寫了老長一篇序, 應該也算是”preamble”吧 wink 表情符號
*hc 2015.11.03 補
「滕王高閣臨江渚，佩玉鳴鸞罷歌舞。畫棟朝飛南浦雲，朱簾暮卷西山雨。閒雲潭影日悠悠，物換星移幾度秋。閣中帝子今何在，檻外長江空自流。」
「滕王高閣臨江渚，佩玉鳴鸞罷歌舞。畫棟朝飛南浦雲，朱簾暮卷西山雨。閒雲潭影日悠悠，物換星移幾度秋。閣中帝子今何在，檻外長江空自流。」
十年前，他是英國某在台MBA課程的在職學生。今天打電話給我，講話還是那麼元氣淋漓。
希望老師為竹北生技-醫療器材公司推薦品管人才，約35歲最好......
近9點，夢到Email 有許達然來信......醒來，
中午台大：買mouse (之前用Fujitue Wireless，電池不環保，文具雜貨店，生意好、台商149元)、【意識】83、50元素食(3人--一人印度/高雄/臺大研究nano diamond.....)、文學院、演講之多....順奕資助演講。
楊金山
2015年2~3月，東海大學"校長"事件鬧得沸騰，楊金山兄當時從美國返校。
當時，我因為與美國的校友有諸多通信討論，當然也與金山兄討論，不管是他在東海校內的親身觀察或是回美國之後的關懷母校(他的通信都採用英國文).......
10月初，我發現楊金山兄有10萬美元的捐款 (之後校友會袁會長說，我看漏另外一筆5萬美元.......)
這回他參加畢業40周年、創校60周年的慶祝晚會，很可惜我缺席，不過，我們在社群網有些連絡，這都虧沈金標先生的照相：- 東海大學 IE系 1975級同學
- 蔡世順
- Timeline：[OPTOGO-從我到我們]台灣館正式落幕 ；米蘭世博會台灣提案_外帶國家館
- 曹永洋 (2)：改廖志峰作業；《歷史人物的回聲》
- 陳守國(壹電視總經理)：夫人陶藝；蔣渭水移靈櫻花陵園(黃聲遠)；農地農用；彭文正、李晶玉事件
- 江春男 (司馬文武)。 馮滬祥的抗戰（江春男）
連女士，
真的非常抱歉，您要的書，都還沒出版！
或許我明年當努力以赴，出版了再通知您。
2015-11-03 11:43 GMT+08:00 連浩雯 <Graya@dynaplus.com.tw>:
您好,想先和您確認網站上以下待出版書籍是否仍未出版
The Inaugural Lecture of Wendy-Huang Visiting Fellowship
順奕訪問學者講座
Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
Nonclassical logics ─ From Algebraic Viewpoint
Professor Hiroakira Ono(小野寛晰教授)
Distinguished Professor
Japan Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST), Ishikawa,Japan
Email.:ono@jaist.ac.jp
Lecture 1. Many-valued Semantics
October 20 (Monday) 15:30 p.m.
Room 302, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
Lecture 2. Algebraic Structures for Intuitionistic Logic
October 28 (Tuesday) 15:30 p.m.
Room 302, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
Lecture 3. Residuation: A Key Concept Which Combines Fuzzy Logics with Intuitionistic Logic
October 31 (Friday) 15:30 p.m.
Room 302, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
Lecture 3. Further Connections Between Logic and Algebra
Room 302, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
*Bonus: On Interpolation Properties
October 25, 09:00-10:30 a.m.
Keynote speech for the 2nd Taiwan Philosophical Logic Colloquium(TPLC-2014)
Room 302, Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University
Abstract
This is a moderate introduction to algebraic ideas and methods in logic. In the middle of the 19th century, G. Boole and A. de Morgan introduced algebraic methods into logic for the first time and attempted to express logical reasoning like algebraic calculation. Later de Morgan described Boole’s work as:
That the symbolic processes of algebra, invented as tools of numerical calculation, should be competent to express every act of thought, and to furnish the grammar and dictionary of an all containing system of logic, would not have been believed until it was proved.
Though semantics for nonclassical logics are mostly limited to algebraic ones until the end of the 1950s, relational semantics introduced by S. Kripke has taken the place of algebraic semantics and it became the main stream of semantics for nonclassical logics, in particular for modal logics and superintuitionistic logics. An apparent merit of Kripke semantics lies in the facts that it is much more intuitively understandable and philosophically persuasive than algebraic one, and also that it is mathematically more tractable since each Kripke frame consists of a quite simple structure, i.e. a set (of possible worlds) with binary (accessibility) relations.
Model theoretic approach based on Kripke semantics has made important and quite successful progresses in the latter half of the last century, but algebraic approach had not drawn much attention until the end of the 1980s. But recent developments of abstract algebraic logic and also of algebraic study of substructural logics reveal essential and sometimes surprising interconnections between logic and algebras. In my lectures, I will explain algebraic approach to logic and some important key concepts, like algebraization, residuation and algebraic proof theory, without assuming any particular knowledge of algebra nor going into technical details.
主辦單位：國立臺灣大學哲學系邏輯、心靈與方法論研究室
本講座蒙順奕有限公司襄助全額經費
沒有留言:
張貼留言