近午找Soyinka Reith Lectures 已是10年前的書沒找到
買德國的科學.
1230-1400 新加坡片結婚那件事.
陽光真不是蓋的快中元節.
摘索因卡詩一段寄 大埔事件"拆政府" 2013年8月18臺北凱道:
非豐祭而是人慾橫流之恆嘔
損益計算時但留殘渣棄佳釀
No feast but the eternal retch of human surfeit
No drinking but dregs at reckoning of loss and profit
---IKEJA, Friday, Four O'clock ( October '66) Idanre: & other poems (1967,p.49) by Wole Soyinka,
Ta-Ta, London. Hello, Awesome.
By SARAH LYALL
Published: August 17, 2013
EVEN after 18 years, I never really knew where I stood with the English. Why did they keep apologizing? (Were they truly sorry?) Why were they so unenthusiastic about enthusiasm? Why was their Parliament full of classically educated grown-ups masquerading as unruly schoolchildren?
Ping Zhu
Readers’ Comments
Share your thoughts.
Why did rain surprise them? Why were they still obsessed by the Nazis?
Why were they so rude about Scotland and Wales, when they all belonged
to the same, very small country? And — this was the hardest question of
all — what lay beneath their default social style, an indecipherable
mille-feuille of politeness, awkwardness, embarrassment, irony,
self-deprecation, arrogance, defensiveness and deflective humor?
Now that my spell as a foreign correspondent for The New York Times has
ended and I’ve come back home — if a place counts as home when you’ve
been away for so long — I’ve had some time to think about how Britain
and America have changed, and how I have.
When I got to London, it was a calmer time. The only terrorists anyone
worried about were the ones from Ireland. Margaret Thatcher’s
Conservative revolution was winding down. Princess Diana had yet to
reveal that there were three people in her marriage. David Beckham had
yet to learn that he could make extra money by posing alluringly in his
underpants. Rupert Murdoch’s News of the World had yet to close in
disgrace.
Meanwhile, Loyd Grossman, an American-born food-show host and purveyor
of his own brand of spaghetti sauce, radiated from my television set
like a piece of performance art representing the pitfalls of long-term
expatriate-ism. The problem was his accent, a bizarre strangulated sui
generis concoction that sounded as equally incomprehensible to English
people as to Americans. It was not even mid-Atlantic, except in the
sense that perhaps it was the way they used to speak in the lost city of
Atlantis.
I resolved to hang on to my own accent, mainly by watching a lot of
American TV, and to assimilate as best I could while remembering where I
came from. What happens then is that you begin to see through the
looking glass from both sides. I began to understand how America
appeared from 3,000 miles away — not just the things Britons admired,
but the things they didn’t.
And so a country where even Conservatives are proud of the nationalized
health service cannot comprehend a system that leaves tens of millions
of people unable to afford basic health care. A country that all but
banned guns after the slaughter of 16 small children in Scotland in 1996
cannot understand why some Americans’ response to mass shootings is to
argue for more gun rights, not fewer.
Despite the sometimes immature behavior of Britain’s legislators, they
manage to enact laws without deliberately obstructing the running of the
country. Britons are perplexed by the sclerotic hatred infecting so
much political discourse in America. And not one Briton I ever met
understood why being able to see Russia from Alaska was at one time
apparently considered an acceptable foreign-policy credential for a
prospective vice president.
Britons admire and consume American culture, but feel threatened by and
angry at its excesses and global dominance. They are both envious and
suspicious of Americans’ ease and confidence in themselves. They want
American approval but feel bad about seeking it. Like a teenager worried
that his more popular friend is using him for extra math help but will
snub him in the cafeteria, they are unduly exercised by the “special
relationship” — endlessly deconstructing what it meant, for instance,
when in 2009 Gordon Brown, then the prime minister, gave President Obama
a handsome penholder made of wood from a Victorian anti-slave ship,
while Mr. Obama reportedly gave him a stack of movies that were
incompatible with British DVD players.
Also, Britons are not automatically impressed by what I always thought
were attractive American qualities — straightforwardness, openness,
can-doism, for starters — and they suspect that our surface friendly
optimism might possibly be fake. (I suspect that sometimes they might
possibly be right.) Once, in an experiment designed to illustrate
Britons’ unease with the way Americans introduce themselves in social
situations (in Britain, you’re supposed to wait for the host to do it), I
got a friend at a party we were having to go up to a man he had never
met. “Hi, I’m Stephen Bayley,” my friend said, sticking out his hand.
“Is that supposed to be some sort of joke?” the man responded.
The pursuit of happiness may be too garish a goal, it turns out, in the
land of the pursuit of not-miserableness. After enough Britons respond
with “I can’t complain” when you ask them how they are, you begin to
feel nostalgic about all those psyched Americans you left behind.
Readers’ Comments
Share your thoughts.
Sometimes in London I felt stupidly enthusiastic, like a Labrador puppy
let loose in an antique store, or overly loud and gauche, like a guest
who shows up at a memorial service wearing a Hawaiian shirt and
traumatizes the mourners with intrusive personal questions.
Britain became more American while I lived there — everyone did, thanks
to the Internet and the global economy. By this spring, 25 percent of
the adult population was obese, and doctors were calling the country
“the fat man of Europe.” Like a pale cousin of the Republican Party, the
Conservative Party began squabbling with itself.
The rise of the right-wing British National Party, coupled with the
populist influence of the popular Daily Mail, shifted the political axis
to the right; the government cut welfare spending and tightened the
borders. Even as London transformed into an international town square,
there was talk that Britain might pull out of the European Union.
But the British character lay underneath it all, and that never changed.
Many of the stories I covered had to do with the question Britons have
asked themselves incessantly since their empire fell: Who are we, and
what is our place in the world? It wasn’t until the opening ceremony of
the Olympic Games last summer, with its music medleys and dancing nurses
and quotes from Shakespeare and references to Mary Poppins and sly
inclusion of the queen and depictions of the Industrial Revolution and
compendiums of key moments in British television history, that the
country seemed to have found some sort of answer.
It was a bold, ecstatic celebration of all sorts of things —
individuality, creativity, quirkiness, sense of humor, playfulness,
rebelliousness and competence in the face of potential chaos — and more
than anything I have ever seen, it seemed to sum up what was great about
Britain.
AMERICA has always been secure about its place in the world, though its
self-belief is fraying a bit. But while Britain was figuring itself out,
America was changing, too.
I’ve come back often, so it’s not like it was a total shock. But while I
wasn’t paying attention, Arizona for some reason got its own Major
League Baseball team. New York City’s center of gravity shifted to
Brooklyn, at least according to the people who live in Brooklyn.
In other developments, available phone numbers ran out, forcing the
introduction of unpleasant new area codes. “Awesome” went from being a
risible word used only by stoners and surfers to an acceptably
ubiquitous modifier, the Starbucks of adjectives.
New York City Transit began kindly informing passengers how long they
would have to wait until the next train. A few Americans started going
only to restaurants with lovingly reared, locally sourced
unpronounceable ingredients; the rest started going only to restaurants
with All-U-Can-Eat Fat Plate specials.
The Kardashians arrived and would not leave.
Now that I’m back, I feel somewhat Loyd Grossman-ish. I am thrilled to
be in a city that has the cultural advantage of having a garbage can on
every corner, but sad to leave one whose mayor speaks off-the-cuff
Latin, employs expressions like “inverted pyramid of piffle” and last
summer compared the Olympic beach volleyball players to wet otters.
After years of using pound and euro coins, I find dollar bills
cumbersome and idiotic. After years of living happily among Britons who
by New York standards would be considered functioning alcoholics, I now
find my old friends’ tendency to order wine by the glass, not the
bottle, unnecessarily Puritanical.
I’ve grown accustomed to British friends who, when it comes to personal
matters, don’t ask much, don’t tell much and really, really, don’t want
to get into it. We lived for more than 15 years next to a couple who
corresponded with us almost exclusively by letter. I have become an
expert in the art of the anodyne weather discussion. I’m chronically
sorry.
“Sorry,” I said to a Metro-North conductor the other day, when I
disrupted the swift completion of his progression through the train by
asking what time we would get to my stop. “No problem,” he said, looking
surprised at my apology, and so I apologized again, for apologizing.
It is enough to make your head spin. There I was at the Apple store the
other day, asking basic technical questions and trying not to take up
too much of anyone’s mental space. I told the salesclerk that I had to
change my address, since I’d just moved back.
He asked me a million questions: Why? Where was I going to live? How about my family? How did I feel?
He considered the whole thing for a moment — me, the move, New York, life.
“Awesome!” he said. And I think he really meant it.
Table of Contents
Part I Sociological Reflections on Mozart. .He Simply Gave Up and Let Go.Bourgois Musicians in Court Society.
Mozart Becomes a Freelance Artist.
Craftsmen's Art and Artists' Art.
The Artist in the Human Being.
The Formative Years of a Genius.
Mozart's Youth - Between Two Social Worlds.
Part II .
Mozart's Revolt: from Salzburg to Vienna.
Emancipation Completed: Mozart's Marriage.
PThe Drama of Mozart's Life: a Chronology in Note Form.
Two Notes.
Editor's Afterword.
Index.
昨晚臨睡
Norbert Elias身後編輯出的《莫札特：探求天才的奧秘》Mozart: Portrait of a Genius。
Part I Sociological Reflections on Mozart
He simply Gone up and Let Go 這第一章關懷Mozart 最後幾年的夢碎與孤寂
Part II
Mozart's Revolts: From Salzburg to Vienna
| Title | Mozart: Portrait of a Genius |
| Author | Norbert Elias |
| Editor | Michael Schröter |
| Publisher | University of California Press, 1993/ Polity Press 1994 |
| Length | 152 pages |
"Mozart's need for love had grown uncertain of itself in early childhood. His feeling of being unloved found constant confirmation in his changing experiences over the years, and the intensity of his unsatisfied desire to be loved, detectable as a dominant wish throughout his life, very largely determined what had meaning for him and what did not."--From the book
One of the most important social thinkers of our time provides a haunting portrait of Mozart's life and creative genius. German sociologist Norbert Elias examines the paradoxes in Mozart's short existence--his brilliant creativity and social marginality, his musical sophistication and personal crudeness, his breathtaking accomplishments and deep despair.
Using psychoanalytic insights, Elias examines Leopold Mozart's carefully honed ambitions for his son and protege. From the age of six Mozart traveled with his father, performing in the major courts throughout Europe. The elder Mozart worked on his son "like a sculptor on his sculpture," and this deep bond formed the lietmotif in understanding Mozart's early talent and complicated psyche.
Mozart chafed at the constraints of Viennese courtly culture. Growing up in a society which viewed musicians as manual laborers producing entertainment for the court, he fought for an independent livelihood. Vienna's aristocracy ultimately turned its back on the composer, who faced mounting debts, no work, and no prospect of fulfilling his innermost desires. He died feeling that his life had become empty of meaning.
Elias ponders the concept of genius, which he sees as a complex marriage of fantasy, inspiration, and convention. In exploring the tension between personal creativity and the tastes of an era, he gives us a book of startling insight and discovery. "Mozart's need for love had grown uncertain of itself in early childhood. His feeling of being unloved found constant confirmation in his changing experiences over the years, and the intensity of his unsatisfied desire to be loved, detectable as a dominant wish throughout his life, very largely determined what had meaning for him and what did not."--From the book
One of the most important social thinkers of our time provides a haunting portrait of Mozart's life and creative genius. German sociologist Norbert Elias examines the paradoxes in Mozart's short existence--his brilliant creativity and social marginality, his musical sophistication and personal crudeness, his breathtaking accomplishments and deep despair.
Using psychoanalytic insights, Elias examines Leopold Mozart's carefully honed ambitions for his son and protege. From the age of six Mozart traveled with his father, performing in the major courts throughout Europe. The elder Mozart worked on his son "like a sculptor on his sculpture," and this deep bond formed the lietmotif in understanding Mozart's early talent and complicated psyche.
Mozart chafed at the constraints of Viennese courtly culture. Growing up in a society which viewed musicians as manual laborers producing entertainment for the court, he fought for an independent livelihood. Vienna's aristocracy ultimately turned its back on the composer, who faced mounting debts, no work, and no prospect of fulfilling his innermost desires. He died feeling that his life had become empty of meaning.
Elias ponders the concept of genius, which he sees as a complex marriage of fantasy, inspiration, and convention. In exploring the tension between personal creativity and the tastes of an era, he gives us a book of startling insight and discovery.
沒有留言:
張貼留言