2008年4月29日 星期二

04292008 周二

晨大雨


真敢社文化講座之2 /羅斌:離開荷蘭─從我前半生的東方見聞錄到大稻埕與台北的美食 朋友論文:〈都城耶?散城耶?試探現代都會情境的二元含混傾向〉

現在:快過氣的專業管理人顧問

喜歡「新知」(無所不讀)

志向:整理翻譯幾位大師的作品

性格:粗糙,喜愛交友

優點:耐力夠;缺點:「志空才疏」「行動力不足」等



4:53 PM Tony: 失蹤多日 去了何處
4:54 PM me: 我去中山8天
4:55 PM 必須離開 歡迎來台大走走
4:56 PM Tony: 大陸各項建設突飛猛進令日心驚
4:57 PM 日是人之誤
4:58 PM me: bye 再談
Tony: 5/7下午2:30 王晃三在國父紀念館演講




巨擘問時瑋

散步
4:53 PM Tony: 失蹤多日 去了何處
4:54 PM me: 我去中山8天
4:55 PM 必須離開 歡迎來台大走走
4:56 PM Tony: 大陸各項建設突飛猛進令日心驚
4:57 PM 日是人之誤
4:58 PM me: bye 再談
Tony: 5/7下午2:30 王晃三在國父紀念館演講


Dear Dirac

KJ 交辦我兩件事
一是如何善用 Google公司資源
我認為要了解google的許多近乎 free的優秀服務 它也有英文版簡介
要入虎穴
所以請你們先試用gmails 從它去了解全google 已推薦你們
比較它與既有的mail/ note vs application/calender等等

http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/tour.html

又譬如說我們要了解現在那些HTMI FIBER CABLE之產品在市面上流通 可從其SHOPPING找
這提示
説不定以後你們可以將種種產品在網路上賣


リコール:罷免recall
返り咲き:回春,此處是重回政壇
いずれも無所属:任一個都是無黨派,指松尾國玄さん(61)と農業橋本千秋さん,兩人都是無黨派。
THANKS

今天未叫瓦斯 明天再


me: 要通知所有人百合喜訊
Sent at 3:48 PM on Tuesday
rwaylin: 預估週末應有六七朵左右
不過,大安森林公園裡據說幾乎全已盛開
me: 了解 請發MAILS
rwaylin: 大概是光照充足與否的差別

2008年4月28日 星期一

0428 2008論小丑:獨裁者和藝術家日本文化99題  (日漢對照)反思肯尼迪王朝:肯尼迪、越南戰爭和美國的政治文化

看書
還5本書

明目聊天
1 反思肯尼迪王朝:肯尼迪、越南戰爭和美國的政治文化 20 96 1 96
2  論小丑:獨裁者和藝術家 24 115 1 115
3 日本文化99題  (日漢對照)

永和
blue來電 10日 conflict


出差報告兼Browave 公司business strategy meeting草擬開會簡說 (5)

下午我與Dirac談下周六的Browave 公司business strategy meeting 之企劃。

基本上,這是全員參與之過程。

謹貢獻點意見供參考(等Dirac草稿之後我會再談一下)。

簡單說一下我的看法。沒有寫的由當事人提出。

首先,我在報告(1)已草擬此次會議之目的說明書(purpose statement),請參考。

其次,這次稱為business strategy meeting,那我們應談談 business sense:生意必須能持續賺錢,因此我們精實體質建立之絕對必要:

· 精實化(這是指應用Toyota生產哲學);換句話說, lean (LITTLE FAT) ,

4 APPROVING A lean company or organization uses only a small number of people and a small amount of money etc. so that there is no waste:
Nowadays even efficient, lean, well-run industries are failing.

(from Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)

· vital few and trivial/useful many的想法:每部門、每生產線之中,那些人/機 是不可或缺的,或關鍵的—這要保護;精實化trivial/useful many

我們想一下:十年前的中山廠之營運成本,與今日的比較,可能是兩倍多多,那再過五年呢?是否不堪想像?

以上之考慮和事業目標和其展開,建議由吳總講30分鐘。

我說生意系統基本有三:行銷/販賣(我與MartinJohnson都介紹過我用過的dashboardKPIs;我與Dirac等人介紹過我當這職能的做法和建議(市場開發之方式等等));產品開發和工程;營運(operations 生產),再加上(管理人事財務…….等等)支援

所以,希望掛「副總職」的,應報告約40-60分鐘。

譬如說,我說過,「我想我們就每一產品線都REVIEWED過。我們也以 PD1的改善計畫的具體化說明(Jason說報導今天發出)。我們在10日的會議,每一產品線的「負責人組合、工場的直接和間接人員(含各類工程人員)之配置和分攤」、具體的改善計畫(如此才可能緊密追蹤成本抑簡、精實化(這是指應用Toyota生產哲學)的措施是否如期)。換句話說,我希望我們總結並從新看產品-生意之組合。」 這特別吃緊,說不定要由Dirac Harry 一齊主持約2小時。

我又說系統最重要的是各子系統之間的互動:

行銷/販賣 vs產品開發和工程;

行銷/販賣 vs營運(operations 生產);

產品開發和工程 vs營運(operations 生產):生產系統的效率化和可靠性的提升…….

行銷/販賣 vs產品開發和工程 vs營運(operations 生產)

我們可以討論(主題要):如何做可以讓各互動更順利?

譬如說,接訂單的快速決策系統

凍結/變更生產訂單

outsourcing/ private labeling 團隊的建立

品質研究發展委員會(QRDC)
97-2次會議記錄

日期970424日(星期四)下午6:30 – 8:50

地點:品質學會九樓會議室

出席者:王晃三、林公孚、關季明、盧瑞彥、黃廷彬、徐歷昌

主席:王晃三

記錄:徐歷昌

一.主席報告與說明:

學會辦理CQE考試歷時已有二十餘年,為確保證書之公信力,自去年起已經開始辦理重認證的作業。經檢討現行重認證相關作業辦法,發現缺失如下:

  1. 現有的重認證辦法要件繁瑣,不容易掌握重點。
  2. 現行規定過分細瑣,認定作業有困難。
  3. 現行重認證要求未能展現專業成長的期望。
  4. 現有的考試規定制定有年,考試科目與內容似乎未反映品質專業的時代脈動。

因此,本次會議的任務著重於CQE證照重認證的要件檢討,並思考如何配合品質專業成長的理念加以修訂

二.結論與共識

  1. 考慮時代的持續進步,學會各相關證照考試,宜建立滾動式更新機制,針對專業主體知識(Body of Knowledge)、考試科目與內容定期更新。

  1. 對於重認證人員,可考慮發給進階、資深、榮譽各種等級CQE證書之可能性,以提供重認證之誘因。

  1. 關於專業知識與素養成長之部份,建議以滾動式的概念,定期更新,以符合時代需求。

  1. 重認證的積分點數,宜規避小數之概念,建議參考研究生考試70分及格之概念,改以整數70點為通過門檻。

  1. 為鼓勵創新,對於參與創新活動優勝案例事蹟,宜考慮給予重認證積點

  1. 重認證成長活動採計事項,依採現行辦法之精神加以整併及簡化,列如下表。



  1. 建議針對學會CQE CQM CRE CSQE CSQP等各項證照,召開相關委員會核心成員聯席會議,討論認證和重認證的共同性架構。

2008年4月26日 星期六

0427 2008

BBC private eye the great wave by hokusai


me: 似乎可不用看醫生 Sent at 10:23 AM on Sunday 劉玉燕: 嘿!今天也沒有門診。 Sent at 10:31 AM on Sunday me: OK 下午有空去走走 劉玉燕: 你是指去那兒走?醫院? me: 郊外走走 去景美如何 Sent at 10:36 AM on Sunday 劉玉燕: 好的,三點過後吧 Sent at 10:38 AM on Sunday me: OK SEE YOU

2008年4月25日 星期五

0426 2008

(從覺民到覺醒}還沒讀過。只能談些旁觀者的聯想(一種方式是「笑談政事」,正如我和太太解釋陳布雷的故事)。我比較有興趣的是書本封面上半的設計,不知道是否為「尖塔林立」的伊斯坦堡這我們去年稍微談過;今年我深入研讀Journey to the East by Le Corbusier, Edited by Ivan Zaknic《東方游記》,當然倍感親切。

其他相關的聯想為我報 (品質時報 170 期:07 7 3( 週二))其中兩段:

ref.. 繁花的猶大 【聯合報╱林懷民】

hc (附許多資料): 「瑞麟,我的問題是:此Judas 是洋紫荊嗎? 問題太多….」

rl :「根據資料查閱了中山科學大辭典第八冊植物學,

如果猶大樹的學名是 Cercis silliquastrum無誤的話,

那它就是豆科紫荊屬植物沒錯。

至於香港的紫荊花是否為猶大樹的花,我沒研究。」

----

「人權之路」日文版新書發表.「傀儡上陣」在玫瑰古蹟.陳文成博士殉難 26周年紀念

七月二日晚間 在原「蔡瑞月舞蹈社」的「玫瑰古蹟」

並有蔡老師「傀儡上陣」舞作的演出

詳細時間地點,請見新貼文所附的邀請卡:

http://blog.roodo.com/michaelc arolina/archives/3530857.html

燕煮晚餐


Seeking Tranquillity,Kyoto, Japan 京都一年(八年)

再怎麼說 京都一年京都八年 都是別人的故事
我當然也有些自己的故事
譬如說 90年代初與吳國精先生到京都一遊(三天兩夜)
對於吳先生而言 是"文化衝擊"
所以他十來年之後 還會帶留學美國康乃爾大學的女兒去重遊
我在他們廣州中山市的工廠之高幹宿舍中 讀到
京都八年
要了解這千年古都 也需要數代的傳承


 林文月先生的《京都一年》似乎可以增訂 譬如說 加 平岡武夫教授的《白居易》

林文月教授的平岡武夫教授的《白居易》(據(第五屆日本漢學國際學術研討會專題演講)主持人鄭清茂教授說法)



Dear HC :

幾時回來?
有事請教
可以到您的書齋,順便參觀嗎?
Posted by 卡洛玲子 at April 25,2008 09:22

Dear卡洛玲子

在廣東中山市看了8 夜中共宣傳節目之後,我決定”香港半日遊”:緬懷過去上班時代所認識的香港文明—了不起的—可惜,台灣人多半不願意深入了解她。這可以從中華航空公司機上 「星島日報」乏人問津得知:我認為該報當日內容比台灣各大報還好—品味無從爭議,不過香港的”副刊”小方塊比較重智、有國際觀…….


從妳的「真敢社文化講座之2 /羅斌:離開荷蘭─從我前半生的東方見聞錄到大稻埕與台北的美食」,才知道 Robin 是博士呢。貴寶地似乎可考慮請他開荷蘭文課程。(我們80年代在Philips公司打工,竟然找不到這了不起國度的中文介紹……)說來慚愧,因為 Robin ,才有點”大稻埕 居”之體會…..

我似乎已無書齋—新生南路的,幾乎全打包(我當時認為應勵行「極簡主義」);永和的,有點「花果飄零」之劫。所以現在的,乏善可陳…..

對了網路上有好詩的另一翻譯或可供眾友參觀:


公园 (高行健译)
一千年一万年
也难以诉说尽
这瞬间的永恒
你吻了我
我吻了你
在冬日,朦胧的清晨
清晨在蒙苏利公园
公园在巴黎
巴黎是地上一座城
地球是天上一颗星

Le Jardin

Des milliers et des milliers d’années
Ne sauraient pas suffire
Pour dire
La petite seconde d’éternité
Où tu m’as embrassé
Où je t’ai embrassée
Un matin dans la lumière de l’hiver
Au parc Montsouris à Paris
A Paris
Sur la terre
La terre qui est un astre .


關先生轉寄天下的 ppt 可笑

你以為這是雪梨?

這是中國的青島

你以為這裡是倫敦?

這是中國的上海

你以為你了解中國嗎?

中國,已是外匯存底世界第1

中國,已是石油消耗世界第2

中國,已是貿易金額世界第3

中國,經濟總產出為世界第4

我們其實並不瞭解中國

54.3%的台灣人坦承不了解中國

43.2%的台灣人認為政府並不了解中國

超速建設

中國城市的地圖,

每三個月就要改版一次,

才能趕上建設的腳步。

過去15年,中國修建了八十萬公里公路,

足足可以繞地球19圈。

超速建設

世紀建設

孫中山實業計畫中的東方大港,2005年底完工,洋山港已經超越新加坡、香港,成為全球第一大貨運港。

世紀建設

總長度32.5公里,相當於台北到桃園的距離的東海大橋,連結起洋山港與上海之間的貨運往來,讓長江三角洲直接與世界接軌。

世紀工程

一世紀的夢想,短短五年即告完工。

海拔五千公里冰原上,全長1118公里的青藏鐵路,

不僅加強對西藏的控制,更打通了西南的戰略通道。

用人才競爭下個世紀

中國,正用奧運級的教育方針,從文官、大學

到基層教育,打造下個世代的中國競爭力。

人才強國

文官教育

面對全球化的挑戰,中國不僅將一批批的官員送至哈佛、牛津、早稻田、漢城等知名大學受訓,甚至透過與韓國三星的合作,養成國際企業營運的實務經驗。

文官教育

透過MBA教學常見的個案教學法,

要培養中國的官員具有三種能力,

戰略思維、全盤思考;

國際視野、國際接軌;

實際操作的管理能力。

領導人淬鍊

位在北京的中共中央黨校,是未來領導的養成班,而講師陣容除了國際政治家季辛吉、李顯龍,甚至包含GEIntel等國際企業的CEO

大學教育

十年間,中國的大學數量增加了一倍,光是中國大學生的數目,就高達2000萬,逼近台灣總人口數。

大學教育

這群高素質的知識份子,

將是中國征戰世界的最大優勢。

台灣,雖然是一艘不沈的航空母艦,

卻也是艘開不走的航空母艦。

不管如何,都需面對中國。

台灣如何因應?

人民,其實很清楚:

35.5%的台灣民眾認為,當務之急是減少政黨惡鬥。

38.3%的台灣民眾更認為必須加強人才培訓及研發能力。

台灣如何因應?

面對中國,最重要的一句話是:

「不要慌、不要怕,但也千萬不要再混了!」

http://www.cw.com.tw/issue/china

更多中國精彩報導,都在天下網站

0424 2008中山到台北

0424


1200船自中山到尖沙咀
回中環 買票 check in
機場

2000飛回
巴士

These messages were sent while you were offline.

7:54 PM Hsu: yes! I'll do that!

7:33 PM me: i think you are in csq meeting but both mails are available... i am in hk airport pls send my regards to friends of qrd





諸君:
您誠摰的



Congratulations.
This a "remote" greetings from HK airport terminal one.
I 'met" Robin twice last year. The first time he was a versatile master of a ceremony of an unique book. The second time was at his traditional Taiwanese workshop...

Now it was quite nice to hear the love story turns to a new chapter (a never-ending love story MADE IN TAIWAN...)

2008/0424-25 周五

2008/0425 清晨寫 hans已去
白天jk來討論2次1200-1600
以前學生為其夫談"七大手法"

附上最新淨值表

本週淨值小增至 383萬左右 股票投資約25% 債券約25% 定存及現金約50%

續抱吧!

謝謝 你全權決定 不必考慮不要還本才收山 反正世界情勢多詭譎 多靠運氣


王老師

我多將精神用在一家虧損上十億元的公司--他的老董和總經理是我好

並沒有將心思放在qrd
而且從我對知識的哲學和對真正品質主管的了解
我認為csq是"自言自語"
這是真心話 我希望你別介意我的直言
你善於組織 而我深惡形式主義

你們合作很好
我昨午後刻意轉去香港"再見"另外一種文明
覺得這些或多少像你每年都要去芝加哥"再生"

我17日在hk機場巧遇以前電子的所長胡定華夫婦 他當然認得我 還說我法都白了
20幾年未謀面 竟然也只是"後會有期"一聲.....

我知道 我們的故事都將消失.....


0424 惡劣極的桃園機場公賣局之推銷XO員工

這機場已使用20餘年,沒有像2008/4/24 晚上那樣怒氣沖沖、逃離公賣局。

是這樣:我要買某牌XO,服務員根本不打算賣它,浪費我五分鐘要強迫塞給我便宜一百多元的不知名品牌;她說這也是XO,又有優待。

我怒而出走,隔壁的另有其他問題:多標高價,等你說太貴,他們馬上說可打折…..我那有心情討價還價…..

Is there a complete Purpose Statement and objectives designed to move toward the purpose: Direction, measure, reference, target, time frame, and owner?

qc storyline and qc storyboard and other publishings from juse 英文出版品《詳全文

某些組織或公司在mission statement  組織、企業使命、目的書. 將某組織、企業的使命或目的、宗旨綜合而以「目的-手段-成果」等方式書寫出的大綱。又稱為Mandate(命令(書),指令(書))。這之前,還有願景說明書vision statement),其方式略似mission statement.這兩者都可以提醒相關的人的決策是否一致,”…and we’ve had to have the courage to say they didn’t fit our vision and mission statement,” says the COO. Growth…”

這「願景說明書(vision statement)」,是廣為台灣接受的翻譯。(願景)是約1990出版的學習型組織{第五項修煉 }中楊教授的創新翻譯法,它從佛教的「願」出發。A Definition of Vision in a dictionary:一般說的視力【Silver教授 created a corrective lens that contains a fluid, so can be adjusted to fix almost any visional issue.】; 'An Image of the future we seek to create'. 遠景【商業遠景令人難過/難堪:the business vision might not be so easy to swallow。技術遠景:...president and co-CEO of Research In Motion, hosts an innovation-themed, invitation-only "Vision Series" session in the Waterloo (Ont.)-based company's 100-seat auditorium】,參考宗教上意思:Vision與我所不知道的譯人:周士良William Butler Yeats, Irish Poet and Playwright, Dies at 73 (Jan. 30, 1939)

他的書A Vision (1925),大陸翻譯成{幻象} (北京:作家出版社,2006),這是不怎麼恰當的翻譯。

譬如說,Google 公司創業的願景之一就是全世界的電子資訊都可以統一處理。或者在20世紀初的「無遠弗屆的電話」(AT&T)、20世紀下半葉的「anytime/anyplace/any……」。有種領導人是有特異能力藉其生意/事業之願景來領導的,我們稱這種人為visionary leader,譬如說,. Ritz-Carlton旅館連鎖的主管取得2次美國國家品質獎,他選為年度的 Lean Six Sigma CEO of the Year for his vision and leadership in initiating Lean Six Sigma...quality. Under his charismatic leadership and vision, won an unprecedented two Malcolm...

職稱:John Cachat, Chairman and Chief Vision Officer,

Organizations sometimes summarize goals and objectives into a mission statement and / or a vision statement:

A vision statement describes in graphic terms where the goal-setters want to see themselves in the future. It may describe how they see events unfolding over 10 or 20 years if everything goes exactly as hoped.

  • A definition of Mission in a dictionary: purpose, reason for being; also, an inner calling to pursue an activity or perform a service.

Many people mistake vision statement for mission statement. The Vision describes a future identity and the Mission describes how it will be achieved. A Mission statement may define the purpose or broader goal for being in existence or in the business. It serves as an ongoing guide without time frame. The mission can remain the same for decades if crafted well. Vision is more specific in terms of objective and future state. Vision is related to some form of achievement if successful.

For example, "We help transport goods and people efficiently and cost effectively without damaging environment" is a mission statement. Ford's brief but powerful slogan "Quality is Job 1" could count as a mission statement. "We will be one amongst the top three transporters of goods and people in North America by 2010" is a vision statement. It is very concrete and unambiguous goal.

mission statement  組織、企業使命、目的書.

日文:【経営】企業目標(の提示)

將某組織、企業的使命或目的、宗旨綜合而以「目的-手段-成果」等方式書寫出的大綱。又稱為Mandate(命令(書),指令(書))。某些組織或公司在這之前還有願景說明書(vision statement),方式略似mission statement.

譬如說,世界經濟發展研究協會(World Institute for Development Economics Research,簡稱WIDER,總部位於赫爾辛基)的Mission Statement為:

To undertake multidisciplinary research and policy analysis on structural changes affecting the living conditions of the world's poorest people.

To provide a forum for professional interaction and the advocacy of policies leading to robust, equitable and environmentally sustainable growth.

To promote capacity strengthening and training for scholars and government officials in the field of economic and social policy making.

許多企業的mission /vision statement都包含quality字眼,譬如說,

McDonalds:麥當勞"McDonald's vision is to be the world's best quick service restaurant experience. Being the best means providing outstanding quality, service, cleanliness, and value, so that we make every customer in every restaurant smile."

J. Sainsbury:英國百貨商"Our mission is to be the consumer's first choice for food, delivering products of outstanding quality and great service at a competitive cost through working faster, simpler, and together."

*****

翻讀《摩西五經》(馮象譯注;香港:牛津大學出版社,2006)的版權頁時,才注意到它已加上「牛津大學出版社」的使命書【相對於1993年出版的The Oxford Companion to the Bible】:

Oxford University Press is a department of theUniversityofOxford.

It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in&

發現Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (2002)已有這了。

------

answers.com查coin 時 發現 OUP的考古學和建築學都已收編了

OUP之前近百本辭書的資料庫是要收費的

不過現在資訊競爭激烈 必須考量OUP之MISSION--曝光和收入的衝突.....

***** 2007/5/17 感謝David Hsu 的提醒

mission statements of Yahoos and Googles :

  • Yahoo! :To connect people to their passions, communities, and the worlds knowledge.新改
  • Google :To organize the worlds information and make it universally accessible and useful.

*****研究自己的基因,也能藉此了解自己的出生血統及遺傳特性。不只獲Google青睞投資,「23andMe」股東還包括全球第2大生技公司Genentech。

ABOUT US

23andMe, Inc. Completes Series A Financing

May 22, 2007 - 23andMe, Inc., a privately held, early stage personal genetics company today announced it had closed its Series A Preferred Stock Financing, which included investments from, among others, Genentech, Inc., Google Inc., MDV-Mohr Davidow Ventures and New Enterprise Associates.

Terms of the financing were not disclosed.

Achieving this significant funding milestone enables us to move forward with our core mission of connecting people with their genetic information, said Linda Avey, co-founder of 23andMe. We are thrilled and honored to have attracted the backing of such a diverse, proven and innovative group of investors.

23andMe is focused on empowering individuals to access, explore, share and better understand their genetic information, making use of recent advances in DNA analysis technologies and proprietary web-based software tools. The company currently plans to launch by the end of the year and will provide more information at that time.

Our goal is to allow individuals to gain deeper insights into their ancestry, genealogy and inherited traits and, ultimately, the option to work together to advance the overall understanding of the human genome, said Anne Wojcicki, co-founder.

The company is being advised by a group of renowned experts in the fields of human genetics, genomics, bio-ethics, and bioinformatics.

23andMe, Inc was founded by Ms. Avey and Ms. Wojcicki in 2006 and is located in Mountain View, California. More information is available at www.23andme.com.

Media Contact:
Paul Kranhold
Matt Benson
Sard Verbinnen & Co.
(415) 618-8750

出差報告兼草擬開會簡說(2

生產系統:

--必須以全體著眼而非生產線或部門別—“合格人員的整體調度

--以精實(lean)有彈性為要:請思考將一”cell”分成大約作業時間的幾組;每次投一產品【一個流】,降低WIP、縮減周期時間,確定品質(沒有所謂ipqcfqc等之分)

--所有支援間接人員,都必須做「價值分析」

中山廠總經理就是戰情室;visitors要退出;戰區主管要善用

新竹戰情室必須先有生產與業務兩大類

其他想法以ppt檔送吳總


現在是午夜0130 (2008/4/25) 。我腦筋已不太清楚,不過本著這回在中山廠向許多朋友鼓吹「今日事 今日畢」的做法,將草稿給各位參考:看不懂也沒關係,更歡迎參考、討論它。

---

訂於510日周六舉行的Browave business strategy meeting,我(鍾漢清)和黃家榮(監察人)可能是(向廖副總)提議(或「提醒」)的人。所以黃先生在中山廠時,「提議」我回台準備些議題。

德銘在22日時,也向我提出「中堅幹部」的管理發展;所以我隨後向總經理提出日本Honda汽車公司曾採用美國KT法(Kepner-Tregoe兩先生發展的「問題解決學、決策分析、問題解決學等貫通的學問題」)作為他們的根本。

我在415日曾向陳志舜先生說他原報告中的20%改善中缺乏更全國的說明、展開(一種說法Is there a complete Purpose Statement and objectives designed to move toward the purpose: Direction, measure, reference, target, time frame, and owner?)我曾說meeting technology之知識是主管不可或缺的。其中最基本要有開會的「目的說明書」(詳後)和會議記錄。我這回在中山廠,QA部分比較注意發報告(我收到4封);我也要求吳金鴻主持的一每日戰情資訊的會議要有簡要報告他們完成發報告。

本周我與陳志舜、Herbert等人再討論三回合,他們已懂得將產品的cost structure和各種改善案(如採用2× 4取代 1×2的新設計、基座-盒採「開模或全銑」 )結合說明……..

整理出公司的「界定和定位」(definition and positioning

描繪我們所處的商場和戰場;機會、能力與挑戰:銷售層面、生產、技術層面

我們在上述的目標體系和戰略、戰術

我們如何組織、互動和合作

To: define the business of Browave: main business values, mission, scope and scale, and objectives

In the ways of:

GMVPs state their profiles and mappings

Current functional assignment for all of us will not be a barrier for our communication

So that

We can have a more comprehensive understanding of our role in a cooperative social system ( Browave) and a very competitive business.

We know to have to change many ways of doing business to succeed.

白天再加



建筑,思维的符号:邂逅20世纪的不朽建筑

hc剛從廣東的中山市回國

走經早上6點就可以诶聞到數十層樓上焊接之味道

呼喚中國建築之靈魂...

2008年4月23日 星期三

0417-0427 2008 in China Brodwave

"In the nineties, Peter Drucker wrote: 'Every few hundred years throughout western history, a sharp transformation has occurred. In a matter of a decade, society altogether rearranges itself—its worldview, its basic values, its society and political structures, its arts, its key institutions. Fifty years later, a new world exists. And the people born into that world cannot even imagine the world in which their grandparents lived and into which their parents were born. Our age is such a period of transformation, signaled by the introduction of the knowledge society.'

2008年4月16日 星期三

0417 2008 HK

0417 1241 in HK airport using free interner service.
At the airport I met Dr Hu who was the directorateship of ERSO backed eary 1980s.
My trip was accompanied with Herbert and we talked a lot about the module business.
I wrote backed to YY and posted an blogger.

2008年4月15日 星期二

0415 2008

好 終於連絡上了
我昨日特別搭車到園區生活館 吃一碗差勁的牛肉麵
到附近散步
再走經全友 它可能是少數20年還"碩果僅存"的建築物 部分已轉出出租
再去過高速公路的AMP舊廠
改變--新增許多高樓 尤其是新建好的力晶
放眼似乎只有盟立和神達還在....

吳國精跟我講1993年我帶他進NEW OTANI HOTEL和 KYOTO之旅
他還說些上周去日本打GOLF 賞花之事
.
...分析黑澤名的THE SCANDEL之細緻暗喻手法....

難忘的小故事:給一個A

在南加大,有個為期一年的領導力訓練課程,
五十個名額是從全校兩萬七千名學生中挑選出來,都是各個學系的菁英
在每個學期末了,我要為這門課的學生打分數,
要給三分之一的學生A,三分之一的學生B,三分之一的C,
雖然這門課的學生,其用功程度應該都超越了其他班的學生。
但是想到,當他們拿到C的時候,士氣將受到何等打擊。

假如我們從一開始就給每個學生一個A,結果會如何?
每學期開始的第一堂課,我都會告訴學生說:「大家都會得到A。」條件只有一個,就是每位學生都要寫給我一封信,開頭是「我拿到了A,因為我……」也就是說,學生們在學期開始的時候就要告訴我,學期結束時,他們會做到、學到哪些事情,成為什麼樣的人,才有資格拿到A的成績。

米開朗基羅的話經常被人引用,他說:
在每一塊大理石裏,都住著一座美麗的雕像;
你只要除去多餘的材質,就可以顯露它內在的藝術。

如果我們要將這個觀念用在教育上,就不應該在孩子之間做比較。
其實,所有的精力都應該用在切割石塊上,去除孩子的障礙,
讓每一個孩子都能夠培養技能,熟練精通,有能力表達自己。

我們稱這個法門為「給一個A」。打分數、評量式的教育,最大的問題是,學生們會不敢冒險,放棄其他可能性,答案只有正確答案,而且會產生競爭的心態。在課堂中、生活裡,如何啟發想像力、責任感,「給一個A」給我們很好的啟示。

----摘自《A級人生:打破成規、激發潛能的12堂課》第三章,經濟新潮社出版


KJ
江玉國先生可能在大陸 我連絡上之後再談
老吳
我與江總連絡上
他現在在吳江
股票上市在年底
今年電子產品還可以 散熱器等狀況


泰碩電子股份有限公司
Taisol Electronics Co.,Ltd.
http://www.taisol.com.tw/

2008年4月12日 星期六

0412-0413 2008

0413

me: TAKE A WALK SOON
yu-yen: 要不要走去大安森林公園,順道到市圖書館看看。
me: OK
yu-yen: 我們約在同樣的校園跑道,十分鐘過後

趙先生,我花幾分中想:

奠定 肯定

「詩的精緻,劇的張力,散文的鋪陳,奠定趙民德業餘小說家的地位。」(推薦序:世局方寸地 文章九曲腸──細品趙民德的《飄著細雪的下午》/王鼎鈞)

作者簡介(飄著細雪的下午(作者:趙民德,台北:九歌,2007):「…….詩的精緻,劇的張力,散文的鋪陳」肯定其業餘小說家的地位。

這一代的台灣人的斷章

以前以為,一代或一輩,是二十五年。最近才知道,古希伯來等地,一輩是四十年。這本趙先生的"青春戀曲"飄著細雪的下午(作者:趙民德,台北:九歌,2007)之中,有許多"舊台灣或台北"images 譬如說,他們大學時代的舞會或禮拜天的彌沙之後,送女朋友回家等,所搭的是"三輪車"—四十餘年前,台北中山國小是近萬人的,課後富家接送小孩,也只用這。

那時候,台北最高的大樓國賓大飯店,正興建中,也只十來層。現在勉強來個101。那時候的「文星」(台北)等,肯定比數十年之後的「萬象」(遼寧)還有社會張力。

我這一「代」的台灣人…..或許,該用「五年級生」比較恰當。

不過,許多現象真的用「代」當單位比較恰當:譬如說,台灣規定騎機車要戴安全帽。我一直記得1978-79年立法不通過;約1996年,衛生署國民健康局的朋友向我說明,這類相關意外事故的費用節約甚多 --姑且不談朋友的「喪子之痛」的遺憾。

這一台灣之痛,可能須要兩代的人來解決:「有的癌症發生不容易預防,但口腔癌明顯與抽菸、嚼檳榔密切相關,有嚼檳榔習慣者,應及早戒除。」「多年前,口腔癌原不在男性癌症十大排名內,但近五年快速竄升,一方面國內檳榔西施文化盛行,另一方面,農民種檳榔獲利快,…..





東京 人 Tokyo-jin

讀昨日的獨賣新聞
依照法律規定 首頁有書籍的廣告
記下這本 回來查網頁

--
新"可畏"的一代
'Curling-type' rookies should be held in awe

04/09/2008
http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200804090048.html

4/12

New Light on Boswell, James Boswell : The Life of Johnson


午台大curry
1500與燕去"後山" 還是墳墓 通不過 有人"祭 傍晚回台大吃麵75
晚上讀 李 life關於美國 taxation tyrancy等等
看"手傷"

2008年4月8日 星期二

0408-09 2008

7日周一知道下周可free去中山
談 product mgr等組織 broadwave
7/8 熱 睡得難過
8 午借ntu 5本 le corbusier


讀Clark傳 知h g wells 三 vol傳
1點 回 88取涼席

09
早上雨 日本多日狂風雨
bobo為繳作業
午台大 beer

Findings

And Behind Door No. 1, a Fatal Flaw


Published: April 8, 2008

The Monty Hall Problem has struck again, and this time it’s not merely embarrassing mathematicians. If the calculations of a Yale economist are correct, there’s a sneaky logical fallacy in some of the most famous experiments in psychology.

Skip to next paragraph
Viktor Koen

Even some of the smartest mathematicians initially come up with the wrong answer to the Monty Hall Problem. Perhaps the best way to understand it is to play the game yourself.

TierneyLab

Dr. Chen provides a more detailed explanation of his research at TierneyLab. Join the discussion.

Go to TierneyLab »

Further Reading

"Behind Monty Hall's Doors: Puzzle, Debate and Answer?" John Tierney. July 21, 1991.

"Rationalization and Cognitive Dissonance: Do Choices Affect or Reflect Preferences?" M. Keith Chen. Working paper, Jan. 2008.

"The Origins of Cognitive Dissonance: Evidence From Children and Monkeys." Louisa C. Egan, Laurie R. Santos, Paul Bloom, Psychological Science, November 2007.

"Go Ahead, Rationalize. Monkeys Do It, Too." John Tierney. Nov. 6, 2007.

"Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology." Edited by Eddie Harmon-Jones and Judson Mills. (American Psychological Association, 1999.)

"Stumbling on Happiness." Daniel Gilbert. Knopf, 2007.

RSS Feed

The economist, M. Keith Chen, has challenged research into cognitive dissonance, including the 1956 experiment that first identified a remarkable ability of people to rationalize their choices. Dr. Chen says that choice rationalization could still turn out to be a real phenomenon, but he maintains that there’s a fatal flaw in the classic 1956 experiment and hundreds of similar ones. He says researchers have fallen for a version of what mathematicians call the Monty Hall Problem, in honor of the host of the old television show, “Let’s Make a Deal.”

Here’s how Monty’s deal works, in the math problem, anyway. (On the real show it was a bit messier.) He shows you three closed doors, with a car behind one and a goat behind each of the others. If you open the one with the car, you win it. You start by picking a door, but before it’s opened Monty will always open another door to reveal a goat. Then he’ll let you open either remaining door.

Suppose you start by picking Door 1, and Monty opens Door 3 to reveal a goat. Now what should you do? Stick with Door 1 or switch to Door 2?

Before I tell you the answer, I have a request. No matter how convinced you are of my idiocy, do not immediately fire off an angry letter. In 1991, when some mathematicians got publicly tripped up by this problem, I investigated it by playing the game with Monty Hall himself at his home in Beverly Hills, but even that evidence wasn’t enough to prevent a deluge of letters demanding a correction.

Before you write, at least try a few rounds of the game, which you can do by playing an online version of the game. Play enough rounds and the best strategy will become clear: You should switch doors.

This answer goes against our intuition that, with two unopened doors left, the odds are 50-50 that the car is behind one of them. But when you stick with Door 1, you’ll win only if your original choice was correct, which happens only 1 in 3 times on average. If you switch, you’ll win whenever your original choice was wrong, which happens 2 out of 3 times.

Now, for anyone still reading instead of playing the Monty Hall game, let me try to explain what this has to do with cognitive dissonance.

For half a century, experimenters have been using what’s called the free-choice paradigm to test our tendency to rationalize decisions. This tendency has been reported hundreds of times and detected even in animals. Last year I wrote a column about an experiment at Yale involving monkeys and M&Ms.

The Yale psychologists first measured monkeys’ preferences by observing how quickly each monkey sought out different colors of M&Ms. After identifying three colors preferred about equally by a monkey — say, red, blue and green — the researchers gave the monkey a choice between two of them.

If the monkey chose, say, red over blue, it was next given a choice between blue and green. Nearly two-thirds of the time it rejected blue in favor of green, which seemed to jibe with the theory of choice rationalization: Once we reject something, we tell ourselves we never liked it anyway (and thereby spare ourselves the painfully dissonant thought that we made the wrong choice).

But Dr. Chen says that the monkey’s distaste for blue can be completely explained with statistics alone. He says the psychologists wrongly assumed that the monkey began by valuing all three colors equally.

Its relative preferences might have been so slight that they were indiscernible during the preliminary phase of the experiment, Dr. Chen says, but there must have been some tiny differences among its tastes for red, blue and green — some hierarchy of preferences.

If so, then the monkey’s choice of red over blue wasn’t arbitrary. Like Monty Hall’s choice of which door to open to reveal a goat, the monkey’s choice of red over blue discloses information that changes the odds. If you work out the permutations (see illustration), you find that when a monkey favors red over blue, there’s a two-thirds chance that it also started off with a preference for green over blue — which would explain why the monkeys chose green two-thirds of the time in the Yale experiment, Dr. Chen says.

Does his critique make sense? Some psychologists who have seen his working paper answer with a qualified yes. “I worked out the math myself and was surprised to find that he was absolutely right,” says Daniel Gilbert, a psychologist at Harvard. “He has essentially applied the Monty Hall Problem to an experimental procedure in psychology, and the result is both instructive and counter-intuitive.”

Dr. Gilbert, however, says that he has yet to be persuaded that this same flaw exists in all experiments using the free-choice paradigm, and he remains confident that the overall theory of cognitive dissonance is solid. That view is shared by Laurie R. Santos, one of the Yale psychologists who did the monkey experiment.

“Keith nicely points out an important problem with the baseline that we’ve used in our first study of cognitive dissonance, but it doesn’t apply to several new methods we’ve used that reveal the same level of dissonance in both monkeys and children,” Dr. Santos says. “I doubt that his critique will be all that influential for the field of cognitive dissonance more broadly.”

Dr. Chen remains convinced it’s a broad problem. He acknowledges that other forms of cognitive-dissonance effects have been demonstrated in different kinds of experiments, but he says the hundreds of choice-rationalization experiments since 1956 are flawed.

Even when the experimenters use more elaborate methods of measuring preferences — like asking a subject to rate items on a scale before choosing between two similarly-ranked items — Dr. Chen says the results are still suspect because researchers haven’t recognized that the choice during the experiment changes the odds. (For more of Dr. Chen’s explanation, see TierneyLab.)

“I don’t know that there’s clean evidence that merely being asked to choose between two objects will make you devalue what you didn’t choose,” Dr. Chen says. “I wouldn’t be completely surprised if this effect exists, but I’ve never seen it measured correctly. The whole literature suffers from this basic problem of acting as if Monty’s choice means nothing.”

2008年4月7日 星期一

0408 2008




向胡版主至謝:

1961年問世的這首歌
紅遍全球
是日本,或者亞洲,唯一進入美國熱門排行榜」

我到Wikipedia 查此曲,才知道當年,因為「此曲只應天上有」,美國版本純粹為發音鏗鏘、好記方便,取名改為Sukiyaki –介紹中還舉出Newsweek評說:「真是豈有此理,這好像將"Moon River"介紹到日本並改歌名為 "Beef Stew."[3]

---隨手筆記

昨晚回永和巧遇昔日傳記:傳主 Kenneth McKenzie Clark, Baron Clark of Saltwood, OM, CH, KCB, FBA (July 13, 1903May 21, 1983) 的作品約三分之一強台灣有翻譯本。

· Another Part of the Wood (1974) (autobiography) –這本有他的簽名,讀前面,講到他老爸當年賭場都用金幣Louis d'or(第一次世界大戰之後改成籌碼,他老爸就興趣缺缺),所以他早上請安時,常常可以從其床邊之深深深幾許的dip抽獎(’….when I went in to say good-morning to my parents at breakfast time, the dip in my father’s bed would often be deep in golden coins.’ , p.24--賭運奇佳,輪盤Roulette (Game) 1911大滿貫maximum en plein—根據.1911版的大英百科,en plein 最高可贏35倍(最大賭注 180 francs),所以兩次是2×180×35 francs

Roulette (Game) - LoveToKnow 1911

· The Other Half (1977) (autobiography) 這本讀他的「尾聲」:記晚年最後一次近東地中海之海上遊輪之藝術指導之奇遇,以及愛妻中風之後,如何死守3年的感人故事。(今晨讀網路傳記,他再婚…..)

0407 2008

政治教育

我在台大餐廳(2008/4/7 1400),聽到一位類似教大陸研究的老師與他女學生的抱怨(六四的圖像無法學術處理,要(寫)讀論文……..):過去教育真偏差。怎麼我問些同學,許多人都不知道陳雲是誰;只教些「台灣對中國之政策」,難道「中國沒有對台灣之政策」?……

Larry King Live When is it on? Tonight at 09:00 pm CNN (ch 53) ... Former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura ("Don't Start the Revolution Without Me! ...

這位仁兄現在居住社區相當生態 他說這輩子大部份投票時都為 Bush Clinton兩家族所主宰 多無聊無意義…..

基本世界情勢

She said that 1989 must rank as (= be) the most remarkable year for change in Europe since 1848.
一年許多處「大」革命;1989多共產黨解體

技術教育

Indeed, author James Collins has written that the System/360, along with Ford's Model T and the Boeing 707 jet, were the three most important business innovations of all time.

傳記

帝国ホテル(ていこくホテル、英称Imperial Hotel)とは、

English

2008年4月6日 星期日

0406 2008

周五起清明節
周日台大散步


Ludwig Mies van der Rohe 的兩件作品--"Around the World in 80 Treasures".

BBC (2005) Wikipedia article "Around the World in 80 Treasures".

在紐約和德國兩次取
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe born Maria Ludwig Michael Mies (March 27, 1886August 17, 1969) was a German-born American architect. [1]http://www.answers.com/topic/ludwig-mies-van-der-rohe?cat=entertainment
的作品 :the Seagram Building in New York.

德國 Bauhaus, 去看 Brno Chair (The Brno Chair at the Bauhaus)




Villa Tugendhat built in 1930 in Brno, in today's Czech Republic, for Fritz Tugendhat.
Enlarge
Villa Tugendhat built in 1930 in Brno, in today's Czech Republic, for Fritz Tugendhat.



這棟在共產時代被改為"體育館"呢....
Then followed the Tugendhat House, Brno, Czechoslovakia (1930), with a single storey on the street-frontage and two storeys facing the garden. The living-room was a continuous space with chromium-cased steel columns and free-standing panel, derived from the Barcelona design, while the full-height windows could be fully lowered out of sight, enabling the interior space to extend into the garden terrace. Every detail of the house was purpose-made, designed by the architect.